WeChat big ban violation of it Commercial warfare between nternet Co

day before WeChat came from small shrimp music, everyday sounds, cloud music NetEase in the circle of friends to shield the link sharing, a time triggered people’s "slobber war", of course more balance or tend to be killed.

 

day before WeChat came from small shrimp music, everyday sounds, cloud music NetEase in the circle of friends to shield the link sharing, a time triggered people’s "slobber war", of course more balance or the tendency of being "blocked", small shrimp music, everyday sounds, cloud music NetEase diehard powder were sent the scream "scream" sound platform is still WeChat and micro-blog.

After the "

" incident broke out, NetEase cloud music quickly responded, saying [announcement] Tencent unilaterally banned NetEase music and other mainstream music App in WeChat circle of friends to share. Welcome to continue to share music with friends in NetEase cloud music platform to enjoy good music experience." The face of doubts, QQ music is not to give way, saying "yes, please go back to the respect of local music!" and then think of the copyright war between music and NetEase before the QQ cloud music music software, this is not the first time to fight on both sides.

put aside the resentful mood of the masses, there is a fundamental problem is that the big ban "WeChat illegal behavior"? This needs from several perspectives.

, blocking behavior in Internet Co is the norm

it was mentioned that WeChat will be so involved in the practice of antitrust law. If you pull the entire Internet Co, Internet Co’s ban behavior is the norm, unless these companies have been dealt with, or just deal with WeChat, then biased.

according to my observation that a domestic market share of more than 40% mobile phone assistant products, directly competing products from the platform is also clear, without warning, directly cleared, in the mobile phone assistant simply not search the application of competitive products, the most ruthless of the application, a rival company, a have not found.

to know the rival company used the minimum is more than a dozen, the user downloads add up to at least break million, even directly "ban", the application distribution center is open, this should accommodate all the application needs of users. WeChat and that I still have a conscience.

in addition to the mobile terminal, mutual blocking between search engines is also very common, light is a direct K station, heavy even the site is not home page.

two, who is the referee

WeChat

small shrimp music, everyday sounds, shielding NetEase cloud music in a circle of friends to share, since it involves the "illegal", who is the first? Certainly not WeChat and small shrimp music, everyday sounds, NetEase cloud music, because both parties are "party", is a fraud behavior. Look at it again, is it a separate user?

day before WeChat came from small shrimp music, everyday sounds, cloud music NetEase in the circle of friends to shield the link sharing, a time triggered people’s "slobber war", of course more balance or tend to be killed.

 

day before WeChat came from small shrimp music, everyday sounds, cloud music NetEase in the circle of friends to shield the link sharing, a time triggered people’s "slobber war", of course more balance or the tendency of being "blocked", small shrimp music, everyday sounds, cloud music NetEase diehard powder were sent the scream "scream" sound platform is still WeChat and micro-blog.

After the "

" incident broke out, NetEase cloud music quickly responded, saying [announcement] Tencent unilaterally banned NetEase music and other mainstream music App in WeChat circle of friends to share. Welcome to continue to share music with friends in NetEase cloud music platform to enjoy good music experience." The face of doubts, QQ music is not to give way, saying "yes, please go back to the respect of local music!" and then think of the copyright war between music and NetEase before the QQ cloud music music software, this is not the first time to fight on both sides.

put aside the resentful mood of the masses, there is a fundamental problem is that the big ban "WeChat illegal behavior"? This needs from several perspectives.

, blocking behavior in Internet Co is the norm

it was mentioned that WeChat will be so involved in the practice of antitrust law. If you pull the entire Internet Co, Internet Co’s ban behavior is the norm, unless these companies have been dealt with, or just deal with WeChat, then biased.

according to my observation that a domestic market share of more than 40% mobile phone assistant products, directly competing products from the platform is also clear, without warning, directly cleared, in the mobile phone assistant simply not search the application of competitive products, the most ruthless of the application, a rival company, a have not found.

to know the rival company used the minimum is more than a dozen, the user downloads add up to at least break million, even directly "ban", the application distribution center is open, this should accommodate all the application needs of users. WeChat and that I still have a conscience.

in addition to the mobile terminal, mutual blocking between search engines is also very common, light is a direct K station, heavy even the site is not home page.

two, who is the referee

WeChat

small shrimp music, everyday sounds, shielding NetEase cloud music in a circle of friends to share, since it involves the "illegal", who is the first? Certainly not WeChat and small shrimp music, everyday sounds, NetEase cloud music, because both parties are "party", is a fraud behavior. Look at it again, is it a separate user?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *