Taobao Tmall intellectual property claims before the ban said traffic was hijacked

[TechWeb] reported on November 6th news, according to media reports, recently, Tmall and Taobao to the Shanghai Pudong New Area people’s court injunction before litigation of intellectual property rights, said the Shanghai load and network science and technology limited company "to help 5 buy website and carrier channel software (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. the" Gang of 5 "suspected of not plug in Amoy legitimate competition traffic hijacking way.

 

Taobao Tmall intellectual property claims before the ban: said traffic was hijacked

Pudong court ruled that the two applicants immediately stop the web plug-in embedded in Tmall, Taobao web behavior. And the carrier and the company, the company refused to accept the application for reconsideration. Pudong court hearing on the 5 sides of the organization, and made the decision to maintain the original ruling on the spot.

Tmall, Taobao, said the applicant and the company is to help 5 buy website owners and operators, both of which are online trading platform, and the applicant has a direct competitive relationship.

Tmall, Taobao side said, to help 5 buy website launched to help the 5 Amoy web plug, called parity software, in fact, hijacking traffic malicious plug-in. The user computer installed on the "Gang of 5 Amoy, the use of IE, Baidu, Sogou browser landing, to help 5 Amoy plugin embedded Tmall page, and" in the Tmall page to buy advertising and search bar for 5. When the user selected goods ready to buy, the price of goods will appear near the "cash minus" or "to help buy 5 sweep minus 1 yuan, such as links and two-dimensional code. Once clicked, the page will jump to help 5 buy interface.

Tmall, Taobao believes that the "Gang of 5 design and Tmall, buy a website similar to the Taobao, let many users mistakenly think that is a trade dispute often find Tmall and Taobao theory, so this approach not only robbed of its commercial interests, more negative evaluation on the market image, has not formed unfair competition.

in addition, in order to prevent this unfair competition, Tmall, Taobao has done a security upgrade, but the two were cracked.

court believes that Tmall, Taobao and help 5 buy website are shopping sites, the two have a direct competitive relationship. And the company’s alleged acts of improper use of Tmall, Taobao’s visibility and user base. Therefore, the behavior of the two respondent may constitute unfair competition.

secondly, the double eleven is coming, if not promptly stop the alleged infringement, may cause the applicant’s competitive advantage, market share caused irreparable damage.

finally, the adoption of security measures will not harm the public interest, and the applicant has provided an effective guarantee. In summary, the applicant’s application in conformity with the conditions of act preservation before litigation.

it is understood that, in October 27th, and the company, the letter to the Pudong court to submit an application for reconsideration; in November 5th, the Pudong court organized by both parties

[TechWeb] reported on November 6th news, according to media reports, recently, Tmall and Taobao to the Shanghai Pudong New Area people’s court injunction before litigation of intellectual property rights, said the Shanghai load and network science and technology limited company "to help 5 buy website and carrier channel software (Shanghai) Co. Ltd. the" Gang of 5 "suspected of not plug in Amoy legitimate competition traffic hijacking way.

 

Taobao Tmall intellectual property claims before the ban: said traffic was hijacked

Pudong court ruled that the two applicants immediately stop the web plug-in embedded in Tmall, Taobao web behavior. And the carrier and the company, the company refused to accept the application for reconsideration. Pudong court hearing on the 5 sides of the organization, and made the decision to maintain the original ruling on the spot.

Tmall, Taobao, said the applicant and the company is to help 5 buy website owners and operators, both of which are online trading platform, and the applicant has a direct competitive relationship.

Tmall, Taobao side said, to help 5 buy website launched to help the 5 Amoy web plug, called parity software, in fact, hijacking traffic malicious plug-in. The user computer installed on the "Gang of 5 Amoy, the use of IE, Baidu, Sogou browser landing, to help 5 Amoy plugin embedded Tmall page, and" in the Tmall page to buy advertising and search bar for 5. When the user selected goods ready to buy, the price of goods will appear near the "cash minus" or "to help buy 5 sweep minus 1 yuan, such as links and two-dimensional code. Once clicked, the page will jump to help 5 buy interface.

Tmall, Taobao believes that the "Gang of 5 design and Tmall, buy a website similar to the Taobao, let many users mistakenly think that is a trade dispute often find Tmall and Taobao theory, so this approach not only robbed of its commercial interests, more negative evaluation on the market image, has not formed unfair competition.

in addition, in order to prevent this unfair competition, Tmall, Taobao has done a security upgrade, but the two were cracked.

court believes that Tmall, Taobao and help 5 buy website are shopping sites, the two have a direct competitive relationship. And the company’s alleged acts of improper use of Tmall, Taobao’s visibility and user base. Therefore, the behavior of the two respondent may constitute unfair competition.

secondly, the double eleven is coming, if not promptly stop the alleged infringement, may cause the applicant’s competitive advantage, market share caused irreparable damage.

finally, the adoption of security measures will not harm the public interest, and the applicant has provided an effective guarantee. In summary, the applicant’s application in conformity with the conditions of act preservation before litigation.

it is understood that, in October 27th, and the company, the letter to the Pudong court to submit an application for reconsideration; in November 5th, the Pudong court organized by both parties

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *